Descarga la app Emergencing

Chest compression during sustained inflation versus 3:1 compression-to-ventilation ratio during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated piglets

Revista

Resuscitation Plus

Fecha de publicación

24 de noviembre de 2025

Resusc Plus. 2025 Oct 28;26:101144. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101144. eCollection 2025 Nov.

BACKGROUND: Current neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend using the 3:1 chest compression-to-ventilation (C:V) ratio technique. However, an alternative technique using continuous compressions superimposed with a high distending pressure or sustained inflation (CC + SI) may improve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival, and post-resuscitation outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: In a piglet model of asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest, compare time to ROSC with CC + SI or 3:1C:V technique for providing neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

METHODS: Secondary analysis of 132 term newborn mixed breed piglets (1-3 days of age, weighing 1.7-2.4 kg) from six different studies, which were exposed to 30-50 min of normocapnic hypoxia followed by asphyxia until cardiac arrest. This was followed by CPR with either the CC + SI or 3:1C:V technique.

RESULTS: Although the proportion of piglets achieving ROSC was similar between CC + SI and 3:1C:V [59/83 (71 %) vs. 40/49 (82 %)], the time to ROSC was significantly shorter with CC + SI [median (IQR), 87.5 (66.8-147.5) vs. 120 (76.5-267) s; p = 0.0097], corresponding to a mean difference of -73.9 s (95 % CI -122.5 to -25.3). Survival up to 4 h did not differ between groups (risk ratios 1.04, 95 % Confidence intervals 0.82-1.32), with mean (SD) survival time among ROSC survivors of 237 (18) min for CC + SI vs 220 (55) min for 3:1C:V (p = 0.0623). In adjusted analyses, CC + SI yielded faster time to ROSC (Geometric Mean Ratio 0.67, 95 % CI 0.50-0.88), with no effect modification by FiO2, but a rate-dependent effect on time to ROSC; 4-h survival did not differ between methods.

CONCLUSIONS: Use of the CC + SI technique during neonatal piglet resuscitation leads to a faster ROSC, with no difference in survival.

PubMed:41283155 | PMC:PMC12639455 | DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101144

Descarga la app Emergencing!

Accede a los abstracts en español de las revistas científicas más importantes en medicina de urgencias, emergencias y paciente crítico.

Descargo de responsabilidad
El idioma original es este artículo es el inglés. Mediante el sistema de traducción automático de la IA de emergencing, el contenido se ha traducido al español. Esta es una traducción no supervisada por lo que puede que alguna parte del contenido no refleje con exactitud la publicación original del autor/autores.